The science-policy interface in the context of source water protection: lessons from Callander, ON

Session: 22. - How to Talk Science so Policy will Listen, and Listen so Science will Talk?

Dan Walters, Nipissing University, [email protected]

Abstract

Integrated watershed management is described as a science-based and multi-actor collaborative process that involves social learning and adaptation (Mitchell et al., 2014). As such, policy formulation is a complex process that combines facts and values to make decisions. This study considers how, and when, scientific information and local knowledge are negotiated while developing water policies by exploring the source water protection planning process in Callander, Ontario Canada. Callander’s source water is threatened by occasional cyanobacteria blooms. The Ontario Clean Water Act (2006) and supporting regulations empower local source water protection committees to develop reasonable, science-based policies to protect current and future drinking-water sources.  Source water protection is a multi-stage process that includes watershed characterisation reports, threats assessment, and consultant reports (i.e. the science). These scientific reports were influential in developing policies to reduce the risk of cyanbacteria blooms. However, the science-policy interface is not a linear process. Some of the enduring challenges were related to the institutional design (e.g. narrowly scoped to significant drinking water threats), local knowledge (e.g. perceived threats of external phosphorus sources), and scientific uncertainty (e.g. internal phosphorus loading). Future considerations include early engagement, building policy-relevant monitoring programs, providing timely information, and considering your audience when communicating science.

1. Keyword
policy making

2. Keyword
public participation

3. Keyword
drinking water