Ideal vs real: Lessons learned applying science to Upper Mississippi River restoration

Session: Great Lakes Fish Habitat Priorities Development, Implementation, and Adaptive Management (3)

James Fischer, Wisconsin DNR Office of Great Waters - Great Lakes & Mississippi River, [email protected]

Abstract

Differing perspectives of scientists, resource managers, administrators, the public, and industry are inherent complicating factors in the application of science to restoration and resource management on the Upper Mississippi River (UMR). State agencies often need to bridge gaps among the conflicting interests. General agreement on the role and importance of science has matured over 30+ years of the UMR Restoration (UMRR) program but debate still occurs over the proper scale for monitoring and rehabilitation.  Among agencies, differing restoration objectives, and overlapping or disputed authorities can present challenges. Likewise, public expectations may differ from those of resource practitioners. These challenges are rooted in different social, scientific, and agency priorities, but may be mitigated by regular and purposeful dialogue.

The UMRR program recently completed an assessment of habitat needs by comparing existing to desired conditions. Partners are now revising a process wherein the habitat assessment results will aid future project selection. Lessons learned from previous project selection iterations are informing the new process. Important lessons include: (1) scientists must engage in regular dialogue to understand partners (managers, engineers, planners, and administrators) needs, and (2) resource managers must remain current on scientific knowledge while educating the public and managing expectations.